![]() ![]() It is this continual negotiation that enables recognition of the self as well as the other making these divided spaces liveable. The existence of ’my place/places’ or neighbourhoods ensure the survival of these particular cultures as well as the demarcation of ’their place/places’ suggest not the intolerance of the other but recognition of the other and its culture, albeit on the outside. The narratives, as argued in the paper, articulates the spatialisation of self and their particular cultures through the production of neighbourhoods. The paper adopts an ethnographic approach towards understanding the role of religion in the making liveable urban spaces that are socially and culturally sustainable focusing on individual narratives and experiences in order to capture its different meanings and notions, especially at the local micro-level. The paper attempts to unpack this relationship between religion and liveability in Indian cities, particularly how religion negotiates normatively religious differences that appear to be incommensurable having high potentiality of violence and yet create sustainable liveable spaces. The walled city of Ahmedabad have been perceived as riot prone and highly segregated place where Hindus and Muslims have been living separately since the city was built in early fifteenth century. ![]() Godhra carnage and subsequent anti-Muslim riots throughout Gujarat, India. The paper examines the processes of constructing liveable neighbourhoods in the walled city of Ahmedabad, in the context of 2002. We conclude that changes in the nature of strike outcomes represent an important and neglected aspect of broader changes in the place of organized labor in the American political economy. We find that temporary government intervention in settling strikes during World War I helped move labor and management away from an adversarial equilibrium, and thus allowed growing acceptance of organized labor to be reflected in a permanent increase in the rate of compromise. ![]() What explains these changes in strike outcomes between the late 19th century and 1945? We explore the effects of macroeconomic conditions, industrial organization and product markets, labor organization, law and public policy, and immigration and trade on the costs and benefits of achieving strike compromises. Sometime during the last decade of the 19th century, however, the pattern begins to change, with the fraction of strikes ending in compromise peaking at nearly half during World Wars I and II. Relatively few strikes ended in any sort of compromise. Before about 1900, most strikes in the United States were either won or lost by the workers who called them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |